Alvin's article was published in 2007, which was two years after I graduated high school which makes sense. She contributes this mainstreaming to financial circumstances of the theaters, advancing and affordable home-movie technology, and the art-house subculture disintegrating.
While I don't understand all the costs incurred through running a theatre, I think that as a public we've become too demanding as audience members. I'm perfectly content not having stadium seating, reclining chairs, popcorn, slushies, and other nonsense that only distracts while watching a movie. I don't think mega-theatre owners know this. They get away with murder in the cost of ticket prices nowadays. Even worse, they are taking away student discounts on Friday and Saturday nights. I refuse to pay $9.50 for a ticket, that's ridiculous. All I need is a big screen and a movie projected on it. I think we need to go back to our theater roots, when it was neat to see a movie because it was on a larger-than-life screen. I can eat popcorn, get a movie for $1 at RedBox, and have a fine time in my living room. The only thing a theatre has that I don't, and won't anytime soon have, is a huge-ass screen, but that's not worth $8-9.50 to me.
I totally disagree that the art-house subculture is disintegrating, I think we're just annoyed. I hadn't heard of micro-cinemas until reading this article, and I think it's what I've been looking for. An opportunity to attend a blind screening again. To pay a reasonable ticket price for a film I'll really get something out of. I haven't been to a mega or art theatre in months, a boycott of some sort. I'll have to keep my eyes open for micro-cinemas. In fact, I really should attend more Cinematique screenings at Thalian Hall and support a local theatre.

No comments:
Post a Comment